| |
The Comic Book of Revelations

By Chris Lanier
Blankets
By Craig Thompson
Top Shelf Productions
592 pages, $29.95
Craig Thompson broke onto the comics scene with
the precocious Goodbye Chunky Rice, written and drawn when he was
25. It told the story of a relationship whose cord is ultimately
cut by distance, by the need of one of the lovers to leave the
small town in which they live and test the waters of the wider
world. The lovers were drawn as a turtle and a mouse, but it was
clear that under the fur and shell, they were actually adolescents.
You could tell by their seriousness, and by the faintly morbid
glamour of their parting.
Goodbye Chunky Rice gave evidence of a
graceful formal assuredness, a second-guessing need to underline
its symbolic props, a certain
reliance on sentimental formula, and an open and ultimately winning
earnestness. Thompson’s newest book, Blankets, is more deliberately
grown-up, but retains all of these elements: it seems more an amplification
of Chunky Rice than a development from it. The end result is a
book that’s less satisfying as a whole, but richer and more
rewarding to read.
Blankets is the more-or-less autobiographical
story of Thompson himself — growing up in a fundamentalist Christian
household in
Wisconsin, trying to find a voice, an authentic self, both as an
artist and as a human being. This search becomes bound up with
the story of his first love, for a girl named Raina (the titular
blanket she makes for him as a gift also makes an appearance in
Chunky Rice — in a past life, Raina was a rodent, and Craig
a hardbacked reptile).
The scope of action is fairly circumscribed — aside
from some scenes of wintry nature, much of it happens in classrooms,
rec rooms, and especially bedrooms (both the one Craig shares with
his brother growing up, and the poster-laminated room where Raina
sleeps and where Craig is inducted into transcendent carnal mysteries).
Despite the apparent modesty of this circuit — comfortably
zoned in the circumambulations of high school life — Thompson’s
thematic ambition is enormous. He wishes to tackle, head on, the
opposition of book-faith to faith of experience; the function of
religion in social life; the obligations of truth in one’s
family; the tensions between romantic love and familial love; the
erosions of sibling intimacy when kids grow up and make their separate
ways in the world; and the vulnerability of love to time. (Of course,
many of these issues are intimate issues that can be dramatized
on an intimate scale; and a bedroom can be a universe, where some
of life’s most indelible discoveries are made.)
Blankets is
most persuasive in its nearly tactile evocation of first love.
The revelations of sexual and romantic love are treated
with the awestruck reverence they command in the adolescent heart.
It’s only natural that, to someone trying to be a good Christian,
these experiences would ring with the thunder of Biblical truth.
Thompson has a beautiful facility of line, and the fluid drawings
have a nearly devotional quality — he not only wants to materialize
the past, he wants to make it sacred (the hands he draws seem particularly
eloquent, like the poised and articulated hands of saints).
The
amount of labor that has gone into the thing is undeniable — even
a bit cowing. It’s a brick of work, almost 600 pages — over
the period of four years, amounting to about a page every two days.
This comes to a better page rate than if he’d written, pencilled
and drawn a bi-monthly comic over the same span of time, without
the income a bi-monthly comic would’ve generated. This extended
dedication and focus over the imperatives of groceries and rent
is awe-inspiring.
 |
It’s a fine line between high-flown
sentiment and pure goo, and the book doesn’t always land
on the side of the angels. |
 |
 |
It’s so exemplary and
inspiring, in fact, I wish the book were a greater success. It’s
a fine line between high-flown sentiment and pure goo, and the
book doesn’t always land
on the side of the angels. There’s a self-absorbed intensity
to adolescent drama that makes it difficult to unpack as aesthetic
drama. Especially for “sensitive” types, the emerging
struggle of us-against-the-world makes it very hard to see the
world. High school made me hate the jockocracy as much as anyone
else, but the broad strokes in Thompson’s Manichean jocks
vs. artfags worldview are just too damn broad: every football is
an omen of doom, and you can identify all the good, sensitive souls
by the fact that they’re the ones who are always awkwardly
adjusting the unruly locks of their hair.
Thompson’s rambunctious
symbolism pays off for some splashy effects, but he’s hobbled
by a need to spell his cosmology out and push it past its metaphorical
effectiveness. There’s
a nice bit where Thompson alters a painted portrait of Jesus to
symbolize his rift with certain Christian orthodoxies of the body.
Sadly, he spoils it by later altering the portrait once again,
in an act of symbolic affirmation that’s goofy enough you
almost wish he’d gone all the way and had Jesus climb down
from the wall, slapping him on the back with a wink and a stigmatic
thumbs-up. This, unfortunately, is the symbolic “closure” for
one of the most deeply felt epiphanies in the book, where Craig
finds that feeling the world around him, honestly and clearly,
is a sufficient rebuke against generations of received theology.
Ultimately,
Thompson seems too much in the thrall of good taste. The most gleefully
energetic passage in the book is a pee-battle
between himself and his brother, back when they were young enough
to be wearing Batman and Spiderman jimmies; the age-old rivalry
between Marvel and DC comics becomes a matter of dueling urethras.
Thompson’s work could use a little more of the stink of urine.
(In a scene of guilty masturbation — a staple of auto-bio comics
he was contractually obliged to deliver — even the streaking,
shameful jizz is treated like an act of calligraphy.) He manages
to weave in a number of formal tricks in the pee-battle, without
losing the headlong rhythm of the scene itself. There are arrows,
cutaways, faux medical diagrams, physical objects used as panel
borders, panel shapes that bend outward like ballooning bladders,
and finally a punch line delivered in a small white panel framed
by heavy black negative space. Thompson really seems to think in
the form of comics. Over the course of any dozen pages, you’re
likely to find some novel formal trick, some incontrovertibly right
way of framing things.
Here are two striking examples:
First, a page where Raina takes Craig to a party.
The isolation of the two interior panels of course
serves to bracket Craig and Raina off from the social activity
of the party (it’s a nice touch that the word balloon in
the second panel is actually part of the frame, a private question
Raina directs towards Craig in the midst of the hubbub). Their
traverse through the party opens out into bewildering distortions
of size, a crush of bodies with no shared vanishing point: as you
look outside the panels you’re looking through Craig’s
alienated eyes. The subjective and objective views of the party
are perfectly blended into a total atmosphere — one that’s
garnished by some spot-on portraiture, frozen in bursts of eye-contact
that punctuate the flow of the party.
Second,
a two-page spread where Craig and Raina are feeling their way
toward each other through
some religious philosophizing. The mirroring of their postures
at the outside edges of the pages serves to draw them together
(while they remain the same physical distance from each other,
the mirroring creates an invisible “X” across the pages,
which perceptually seems to pull all the elements toward the center:
physically, they may be across the room from each other, but mentally
they are drawing closer). Craig talks about lust, and one of the
segments of his word balloon holds a picture of his hand, reaching
downward toward where Raina is on the page. Raina talks about temptation,
and one of the segments of her word balloon holds a picture of
her hand, offering an apple upwards toward where Craig is on the
page. The gestures framed in their word balloons are more forward
than their actual bodies: the hands symbolically try to close a
circuit of offering and acceptance. In the middle of the two-page
spread, two narrow panels are set like upright planks, and in each
is a drawing of their symbolical selves: Craig exists in a landscape
of “lust,” cluttered with grotesque and skeletal figures
that are culled from an early episode of sexual abuse perpetrated
by a baby sitter, and Raina exists in a landscape of “temptation”
— the garden of Eden, her breasts barely covered by a strategically
placed sprig of foliage. These upright panels, together with the
boxes containing the gesturing hands, structurally form a cross,
the theological system on which these notions of lust and temptation
are hung. The spread would be too schematic and pretentious a conceit
if it weren’t punctured by a bit of self-depreciating humor:
the symbolical Craig, in his thorny garden of lust, is actually
peeking outside of his panel and into Raina’s adjacent one — hoping
to catch a glimpse of what’s behind that obfuscating scrap
of bush.
It’s hard to square such formal sophistication
with the subjective naïveté of the book, but while Thompson can
make
particular moments
sing with formal innovation, over the long haul the material tangles
him up. Thompson is so deeply lodged in the subjectivity of his
experiences that the flaws of the main character get muddied with
the flaws of the author. He never quite finds a controlled relation
to autobiography: the perspective is not quite distant enough for
the narrative to develop clear outlines, and on the other hand,
it’s not raw enough for the immediacy to assert its own aesthetic
truth. A crucial scene featuring Raina’s father is undermined
because it’s obvious that Craig himself could not have witnessed
it. More fatally, the denouement of Craig’s relationship
with Raina doesn’t appear in the way the author intends it
to: what’s meant to be a defining act of maturity actually
seems petulant and self-absorbed.
Despite these flaws, the formal
beauty and ambition of Blankets make it an absorbing read
(another thing it shares with Chunky
Rice is the feeling it gives you that there will be exciting
and better work ahead). What recommends it most highly, perhaps — because
it’s evidence that it gets its hooks in you — is the
intense curiosity you feel about the real-life models used for
the characters in the book, and particularly how they feel about
their inked counterparts. Does Craig’s brother feel a confirmation
of their youthful bond? Do his parents have a clearer understanding
of his unorthodox spirituality? And, of course, you wonder: will
Raina come across a copy? Thompson has an ability to evoke her — with
a fitful sense of poetry, too — but he never quite fleshes
her out. The way he draws her, she looks lovely, but there’s
a patina of formula over it — her drawn face has a little
bit of that vacancy you get from good-girl art in romance comics.
Her face is almost as much a mask as the mouse-head she wore in
Goodbye Chunky Rice. One hopes for the most unlikely of
circumstances — that
Raina has also, in the interim, found a calling as a cartoonist — and
she’s now hard at work, telling her side of the story.

back to top
|