| |
Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia

BY Phil Nugent
Lyndon
Johnson once said that “when you have a mother-in-law, and
that mother-in-law has only one eye, and that eye is in the center
of her forehead, you don’t keep her in the living room.” The
mother-in-law that LBJ had in mind was Vietnam; Sam Peckinpah’s
was Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia, the labor of love
that he directed, conceived and co-wrote, and saw released in 1974
to
empty theaters and general revulsion. (The first detailed discussion
of it I ever read was in that thoughtful tome The 50 Worst
Films of All Time.)
 |
Peckinpah
had a nihilistic streak that always would have been easier to dismiss
as adolescent bravura if it hadn’t
been connected to his eye for beauty and the emotional power he
could attach to gestures of defiance and comradeship. |
 |
 |
The people who recoil from Bring Me the
Head of Alfredo Garcia aren’t exactly in the same league as the
stuffed yahoos hooting
at the premiere of Le Sacre du Printemps. Those of us who admire
the movie would do no favors to our side by pretending that there
isn’t plenty wrong with it, and that in fact long stretches of
it are tough sledding. Yet the damn thing rewards the patience
of those willing to sit down and flat-out watch it. It has a special
power that’s connected to its being one of the narrowest films
Peckinpah ever made. Peckinpah had a nihilistic streak that always
would have been easier to dismiss as adolescent bravura if it hadn’t
been connected to his eye for beauty and the emotional power he
could attach to gestures of defiance and comradeship. His apparent
death wish was part of a man whose work made it clear that he had
a greater understanding than most of just what makes life worth
living. The tension between these warring parts of himself gives
a movie like The Wild Bunch much of its awesome power and mystery:
you can see the dead end that its heroes are heading for, and you
can feel the attraction that it holds for them, yet at the same
time when you see them cut down the loss to the world feels titanic.
Alfredo Garcia puts those movies in perspective by showing what
Peckinpah’s nihilism looks like in its purest form. There’s no
heroic scale, little beauty, and the most tender relationship is
between a man who’s dead and one who ought to be. All that’s left
is a vein of black humor a mile thick and a feeling of disgusted
rage potent enough to blow you across the room.
It
helps to try to understand why Peckinpah was in such a lousy mood
to begin with. He was in an odd place by 1974, as name-famous as
any movie director alive and at the height of his powers, yet boxed
in. Before The Wild Bunch, Peckinpah had spent the latter
half of the 1960s unable to get work in Hollywood, his firing from
The Cincinnati Kid having left him with the reputation of
a loser that no one could work with. After The Wild Bunch
and Straw Dogs, his reputation was that of Bloody Sam, the
guy depicted in a Monty Python sketch as unable to shoot a tennis
party on a country estate without painting the grass red —
brilliant, maybe, and a money maker, but also an ornery nut with
a blood-bag fetish. Peckinpah had made quieter movies, like The
Ballad of Cable Hogue and Junior Bonner, but they were
so different from the only kind of movie he was supposed to be able
to make that they were released with little fanfare and did so little
business that it was as if they’d never been made at all.
And when he tried to stretch himself, begging for the chance to
film Joan Didion’s Play It as It Lays, it was gently
explained to him that it wasn’t his kind of material.
Then, a major phase of Peckinpah’s career
came to an end with 1973’s Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid.
This, it turned out, was Peckinpah’s last Western (unless,
in a sick-joke kind of way, Alfredo Garcia counts). The movie
was hugely ambitious, and parts of it were remarkable, but the rushes
looked mottled and hard to piece together, and it was made for MGM
during the reign of James Aubrey, the infamous player known as “the
Smiling Cobra,” a man who might have been put on this Earth
just so that God or the devil could have the fun of seeing him not
get along with Sam Peckinpah. Aubrey and Peckinpah warred over the
editing until Aubrey took the picture away and released it in a
semi-coherent form that played as a comic strip of several of Hollywood’s
most famous character actors taking turns getting their brains blown
out — a Peckinparody.
And some folks whispered that Sam, looking at
the mess of footage and despairing of the work ahead, had done it
half-deliberately. He’d never been mistaken for a master of
diplomacy on his best days, and now he was tired and ailing and
very far gone into his cups, and maybe he’d begun to fall
in love with this image of himself, which a lot of other people
were happy to buy into, as a tortured artist besieged by tasteless
jackals. Maybe he’d get more satisfaction out of it than he
would killing himself to get a movie in the best possible shape
to be thrown away by the studio, again. What else was the point,
anyway, if he’d never get to go West again? Peckinpah never
had liked the 20th century. It was as if, as far as he was concerned,
the only good thing about all this technology was that you could
use some of it to restage the old West the way you liked and preserve
the results on celluloid.
When the poor man agreed to do a job for hire,
directing Walter Hill’s adaptation of Jim Thompson’s
The Getaway, with Steve McQueen and (Christ!) Ali MacGraw
in the leads, he went through the motions, staging the shootings
and chases as well as anyone could, but you could smell the pointlessness
coming off the screen from the next county. These dull, nice —
nice! in a Peckinpah movie! — people at center, looking like
movie stars and acting like ciphers, running around robbing banks
and each other, for what? For money — the only thing people
like James Aubrey thought movies themselves were any good for. If
Peckinpah was reduced to making movies about people who weren’t
really worth a damn doing nothing much worth doing, he might as
well do it on his own terms.
At the start of Alfredo
Garcia, we’re back in Mexico, looking at a young girl in a pastoral
set-up so surreally lovely that it might
be a painting; you may blink when other people walk into the frame.
This disorientation effect is fair warning that a bigger one is
coming. The girl is pregnant, and her rich and powerful father
(Emilio Fernandez) offers a million dollars for, literally, the
head of the man who deflowered her, Alfredo Garcia. We seem to
be in an earlier movie period, in a romanticized yet violent fantasy
of an earlier Mexico — maybe the one that the Wild Bunch fled
to. So it’s jarring when men in suits take to their limousines
and airplanes to spread the news of the bounty. And as the awful
knowledge that we’re in the modern world sets in, the natural physical
beauty we’ve seen begins to recede, as if dying on contact with
exhaust fumes and television signals. It’s as if the criminal lovers
of The Getaway who ended up making it to Mexico have contaminated
the place, not so much because of what they are but what they serve
as a reminder of — people in suits and limousines and airplanes
who only fund movies like The Getaway.
Their stand-ins are all over
the place. As the heralds of the bounty, Gig Young and Robert Webber
are smartly dressed, affably colorless,
corporate hit men. They aren’t outlaws, they’re professionals,
probably with good tax lawyers and friends at Halliburton, who
function as cogs in a larger machine; they probably worked their
way up from the mail room. If the new world can’t support outlaws,
it’ll have to do with a lesser breed of hero than we’re used to
from Peckinpah, which considering what some of his heroes were
capable of is an unnerving thought. Cue Warren Oates.
 |
By this point, one
may have begun to wonder if Peckinpah’s message is that not only
can the world no longer
support any kind of nobility, it can’t even justify basic competence,
not even from one of the world’s greatest moviemakers. |
 |
 |
Oates plays
Bennie, an American stranded behind a piano in a dive in Mexico.
He introduces himself, without much justification, as
Fred C. Dobbs, the most pitiable and doomed of all Bogart heroes.
Yet he’s decked out in shades and a little mustache that,
together with his slight build and air of dissipation, give him
a surprisingly
strong resemblance to Sam Peckinpah. A physical resemblance, anyway
— Oates was one hell of a great character actor, but he had
so much less natural charisma than his director that your first
reaction
to him here is that daddy’s shoes sure do look big with junior
clomping around in them. This effect is probably not wholly intentional,
but the thing is, it can’t be said to be wrong for the character.
Pauline Kael once wrote of Peckinpah that “his moral judgments
… [are] based less on what his characters do than on what they
wouldn’t
stoop to do.” (In Hollywood, people take more pride in what
they’ve said no to than in what they’ve done.) Even
grading on a curve like that, Bennie’s standards are nothing
to fly from the flagpole. He’s so desperate for money that
he takes an interest in the bounty as soon as he hears about it,
but it’s when he learns
from his lover, Elita (Isela Vega), that Alfredo is already dead
and buried that he really springs to the task. 1974 was a long
time ago, and we’ve had the chance to get used to being asked
to root for assassins and other lowlifes, but it’s still
a bit of a novelty to see a movie hero who so happily makes the
career transition
from killer to grave robber.
By this point, one may have begun to wonder if Peckinpah’s message
is that not only can the world no longer support any kind of nobility,
it can’t even justify basic competence, not even from one of the
world’s greatest moviemakers. After that stunning opening sequence,
the craftsmanship on display in Alfredo Garcia seems to disintegrate
before a viewer’s eyes. There are scenes, such as a long one of
Oates sitting in bed playing exterminator on his own body, that
seem designed to clear half the theater, and other scenes less
startling but even more pathetically handled — such as a crappy-looking,
poorly pieced-together roadside picnic that Bennie and Elita enjoy
during their romantic jaunt to claim the dead man’s head — that
seem designed to clear the other half. Die-hards may have just
started reaching for their coats at the halfway mark, when Bennie,
right at his moment of triumph, is clubbed in the head and unceremoniously
dumped in Alfredo’s grave, along with the murdered Elita and what’s
left of Alfredo, by thugs who make off with the head.
It’s when
Bennie emerges from that grave that Alfredo Garcia kicks into high
gear. Bennie severs his relationship with Elita, bitterly
condemning her for her decision to stay dead in the grave with
Alfredo, and sets back on his quest. And Peckinpah’s directing
itself gains a new lease on life. The action regains its old crackle,
starting with a shootout in the middle of nowhere that reunites
Bennie with the head as well as with Webber and Young. More amazingly,
the beauty of Mexico, as if replenished by fresh blood, begins
to reappear in the frame — not that Bennie, focused on obtaining
ice so that he can pack Alfredo’s head properly, is apt to notice.
 |
As a would-be movie star he’s an unobtrusive
presence in search of a part, but as a walking dead man he’s scarily
potent and convincingly dangerous. |
 |
 |
Is Bennie reborn or undead? Either way, he’s now a man without
fear, as they say in the “Daredevil” comics, and he
performs with the scary intensity of the wholly single-minded.
Oates’s performance now begins to make sense. As a would-be movie
star he’s an unobtrusive presence in search of a part, but as a
walking dead man he’s scarily potent and convincingly dangerous.
The “dog soldier” notion of the existential hero whose
strength is his indifference to whether he lives or dies is by
now a stale action movie cliché that has been explicated
by such deep thinkers as Steven Seagal and B.A. Baracus, but for
Peckinpah it’s not just a conceit. He’s the one guy sitting in
the office cubicle who really means it when he says that there
are times when, if he could kill the boss, even if the security
guard took him down an instant later, it would still be worth it
just to see the look on the bastard’s face. Bennie patently doesn’t
care and so is beyond reason. Where he once, like many a self-deluded
American working slob, identified with those who pay him, that
was back when he thought he had a future, and cared about climbing
up the ranks to join them. Now, with his future buried and the
stink of death on him, he identifies with the head on the car seat
next to him.
Though it’s regrettable that Alfredo
Garcia is so uneven, things are what they are,
and it may be that Peckinpah needed to slack
off in the first half — muttering , “What the fuck,
it’s
only a movie” — to get to the part he clearly really
wanted to make and ram it home with such effectiveness. Black comedy,
nihilist statement, punk gesture and end-of-the-road Western,
it gives you a one-of-a-kind heady rush taking the popular idea
of not giving a fuck as far as it can go — farther than most
people who claim to be attracted to the idea of not giving a fuck
would
ever dream of going. That’s what Bennie does in the movie.
It is also, for better or worse, what Peckinpah did when he made
the
movie.

back to top
|