| |

The Algonquin Kids’ Table
This Issue: The Wild Bunch

Hayden Childs - 09:41am Oct 15, 2003 PST
Peckinpah called it a movie about bad men in
bad times, but it's much more than that. To me, it's about human
nature, shifting values, and what it is to be a man. Those lovely
long shots are in Texas and Mexico, but they could be landscapes
of the soul.

Phil Nugent - 06:48pm Oct 20, 2003 PST
Well, to start with,
there's the walk. I've seen the movie many times, usually on video
but a couple of times on a big screen, sometimes totally immersed
in it, sometimes just letting it wash over me, sometimes just letting
it play on the TV in the background. But my degree of attention
to it always deepens when the walk begins. The lead-up to the walk
is simple, manly-man's-movie, action picture heaven: "Let's
go!" "Why not!?" And then they're out there in the
dust, each man self-contained but preparing to function as a unit,
as they load up and select their weapons. And I don't know how much
of this was left to the individual actors, but their looks are so
perfect, with William Holden practically ready for a wedding and
Warren Oates looking as if he just threw his clothes on to go out
for the paper and a coffee, and he's toting that gun loose while
Ben Johnson cradles his in his arms like God like Daddy Bear protecting
baby.
This is one of those movies that I discovered
on video during the first flush of the thrill that came with VCR
ownership when they were new. Movies had been these magical things
that you had to seek out as they passed through town at their own
pace, you'd go to the dark temple and bathe in their light for a
couple of hours and you tried to soak them up with as much attentiveness
as you could muster, because who knew if you'd ever get the chance
to see this one again. Then suddenly they were available in these
little cartridges, and sure they were shrunken and usually came
in truncated form with three-quarters of the image missing, but
it meant so much that in this altered but still recgnizable version
you could take them home and examine them to your heart's content.
And I admit it, like many a sensation-starved young malcontent,
the first thing I wanted to do with it was, I wanted to see the
carnage over and over. I used to just pop it in and fast-forward
to the blood ballet at Mapache's fortress and rewind and watch that
sucker again and again. I'd watch them shoot that place to shit
over and over. But every time I watched it, I felt a little more
drawn in by the Bunch themselves--Oates screaming as he swings that
Gatling gun around and then doubling over as he's blown away from
it, Holden and Borgnine staring at each other for a second as they
take a little respite from the action, Borgnine breathing hard,
his eyes looking as if he's someplace far away. Peckinpah said of
his characters that "the strange thing is that you feel a great
sense of loss when these killers reach the end of the line."
That's true, and the reasons for it seem to have less to do with
any sentimental or redemptive qualities that are in the script than
in Peckinpah's ability to arrange bodies in the frame and stage
physical action in a way that brings these people, even the ones
who are monsters, improbably close to you. It's very mysterious
and I don't claim to fully understand it. I can only try to describe
how, for whatever reasons, the movie makes me feel. I'm not sure
that Peckinpah fully understood it, or that he always knew what
he was doing. But I think that his feelings about what he was doing,
even those feelings that might have been inchoate and unresolved,
were very strong and very deep, and that he was able to transfer
it to the people onscreen so that they seem larger than life, and
at the same time we're aware of their vulnerability to pain and
physical damage in a way that most movie violence doesn't want to
even deal with. I remember during my first infatuation with The
Wild Bunch I saw 48 HRS, in which a man's bare chest is blown apart
with a handgun at point blank range, in a way that makes you feel
you're just supposed to give a round of applause to whoever installed
his blood squibs. And at that time I was a big Walter Hill fan,
having seen and loved Hard Times and The Warriors and Southern Comfort,
all of which I still love, but all I could think, after seeing that
scene in 48 HRS after The Wild Bunch, is "Walter Hill's a punk."
It was an extreme reaction based on what Peckinpah's movie had made
me feel. It made using violence only for that kind of turn-on feel
like such a waste.
Anyway, after I'd seen the massacre at Mapache's
a few times, I found that the scene I wanted to watch over and over
again was the walk. It still is. I used to think that if I watched
it enough I'd get to the bottom of what makes it so moving, and
I finally got to the point of watching it over and over and deriving
satisfaction from knowing I never will. Because Peckinpah was capable
of working on a level that you can't learn to achieve--Robert McKee
can't explain what it is about those four swaying hips moving through
the dust that makes them seem to sum up what makes life worth living,
and worth dying for. I used to watch that scene over and over and
video and then shut it off just as they arrived on Mapache's doorstep,
and not just because I wanted to rewind the tape and watch it again.
At the end of the movie, when the Bunch reappear in flashback, laughing
like Walter Huston when his gold dust blows away, and then we end
with them passing through the Mexican village again, I understand
Peckinpah's desire to bring them back from the dead and, in the
wake of their deaths, to freeze a moment when they were still alive,
and I understand why he choose the moment he did--for Peckinpah,
castinets and friendly senioritas were what were supposed to be
waiting for you in Paradise. But Peckinpah's visions of Paradise
were dull and treacly next to his feeling for the moment when you're
perched on the edge, about the declare yourself, just before the
shooting starts. That tense feeling before all hell breaks loose
is thrilling, because it's the moment when his people are most alive,
and the thing is, his people are more fully alive than any other
moviemaker's. If I could change a single thing about The Wild Bunch,
I'd end it with an flashback, not to the Mexican village, but the
walk.
Gus Sheridan - 07:57pm Oct 20, 2003 PST
Wow.

Dana Knowles - 11:35pm Oct 20, 2003 PST
No shit. That post is a thing of awesome beauty,
Phil.
<edit> I'm dropping back in to say
that I've still got goosebumps. Literally.
Hayden Childs - 09:20am Oct 21, 2003 PST
Ditto Gus & Dana,
Phil. Excellent.
But Peckinpah's visions of Paradise were
dull and treacly next to his feeling for the moment when you're
perched on the edge, about to declare yourself, just before the
shooting starts. That tense feeling before all hell breaks loose
is thrilling, because it's the moment when his people are most alive,
and the thing is, his people are more fully alive than any other
moviemaker's.
Damn straight. Perhaps not-too-contrary to Danas
argument in her brilliant Straw Dogs article, I think that Peckinpah
believed in conflict (and not necessarily violence) as a defining
moment of self. His characters set themselves on paths based on
preconceived notions and self-images based on a (usually unseen)
past, but it is only when they encounter the unavoidable Other that
they become truly themselves. In the Wild Bunch, this is when the
Bunch are violated by Mapaches abduction and murder of Angel,
but think also of Gil Westrum returning to fight by Steve Judds
side at the end of Ride the High Country. Or Pat Garrett shooting
the image of himself in the mirror after shooting Billy the Kid.
Or how Junior Bonners conversations with Ace and Curly prepare
him for his battle with the bull (and his age). Or Bennies
final moments in Bring Me The Head of Alfredo Garcia. Or (especially)
David Sumners admission to his wife in the midst of the conflict
in Straw Dogs that this is where he lives.
I've been wrassling with Peckinpah's sense of
ethics. For all his concern with history (ok, maybe not history
in terms of facts, but in terms of historical narrative, Peckinpahs
stories were lies like truth), Peckinpah always flattened events
into one do-or-die moment for his characters. Do y'all think that
it matters -- in that moment on the edge -- what you're going to
declare yourself for? I think that it did matter to him that you
declare yourself for something, but I go back and forth whether
the content of your convictions mattered to him.
In the Wild Bunch, Pike chooses to break the
stunned silence following Mapache's death by shooting one of the
German advisors. I don't see this as a stand for his country, but
a stand against encroaching totalitarian order, a stand for freedom,
if you will. We cheer him on, because the Kaiser was worse than
the alternatives, but what if the advisors had been envoys from
Woodrow Wilson sent to convince Mapache to give us his war against
the peasants? (I guess that this wouldnt happen in a Peckinpah
movie, because all motives up until that final moment on the edge
are based on self-interest.)
Anyway, some of yall have a better grasp
on this than me, Im sure.
It's
an expression of sorrow & waste which not even Kurosawa, working
at the height of his powers, could come up with when he needed an
ending for Seven Samurai.
-------------------->More exciting ruminations on Page Two!

back to top
|