| |

Bastard Night

Parenting in the Age of Irony with the
WB’s Tuesday lineup

By Shauna McKenna
It’s Tuesday evening. I’m walking
briskly from the bus to drop off my bag — quick, before turning
on a quick pivot to get my baby from the daycare center next door.
She dives into my arms, bounces on our return walk home, razzes
me with insolent delight while I feed her. She claims every fat
second of my attention until she finishes her goodnight bottle
and sprawls backwards into sleep.
Now the real work begins. I need
to wash dishes, put the kettle on to boil, wash her bottles, prepare
my own dinner. But tonight,
I face the kitchen with a smile. I work quickly so I can have the
food ready by 8 o’clock, so I can be sitting on the couch
in front of the television, so I can get my weekly treat.
It’s
Bastard Night on the WB!
It took me a while to make the thematic
connection in the WB Network’s
Tuesday night lineup: the tried and true “Gilmore Girls” followed
by the premiering “One Tree Hill.” This is my second season of
loyal GG viewing, and the rapid-fire dialogue and kitschy setting
has
long obscured the show’s premise in my mind. “One Tree Hill,”
marketed aggressively to a demographic 15 solid years my junior,
was the obvious replacement for “Dawson’s Creek.” It
was just something that happened to my TV after the Gilmores bid
their weekly
adieu, pretty images of pouty teens flickering while I prepared
bottles of formula, did laundry, or zoned off in a pre-slumber
stupor.
But those pouty teens have more on their minds
than unrequited crushes and existential brooding, oh ho ho ho.
Lucas
and Nathan,
the male leads, are half-brothers from (brace yourselves) opposite
sides of the tracks. Their father impregnated two girlfriends in
rapid succession, staying with and marrying the college coed and
leaving the high school sweetheart to struggle alone. Apparently,
everyone’s kept more or less out of everyone else’s
hair until now, when both brothers get spots on the varsity basketball
team. A midseason subplot reveals that one of their teammates is
the teenaged father of a baby girl, the whereabouts of the mother
concealed.
That’s probably when I started paying
attention: when the teammate reveals to Lucas (the illegitimate
son) his shocking
secret,
and Lucas responds with a tremulous plea to make sure the baby
girl never feels like she’s something to be ashamed of. Although
I’ve never seen anything so maudlin and self-indulgent on
“Gilmore Girls,” the connection hit me like a ton of trailer park
bricks. Single parenting in saucy outfits to single-parent children
hitting the sauce: Bastard Night has it all!

I’ve been on the job eight months now,
with, of course, nine months of prep work preceding. I have been
pleasantly surprised
by the almost universal social graciousness, tact, and open-mindedness
shown me in terms of my situation. I have been, at times, dismayed
by the unpredictable controversy of court-ordered child support.
And I have been shocked by some of the assumptions made about the
single parent’s concept of responsibility.
It seems like there
are three different stereotypes of the single mother: Welfare Leech,
Joyless Martyr or Professional-class Independent.
We all have a clear image of the welfare leech, thanks to the late-’90s
push for welfare reform: she sits on her kiester all day watching
trashy talk shows, stuffing her kids full of junk food while numerous
boyfriends stop by to light up the crack pipe and have fast, demeaning
sex. The Joyless Martyr is generally a nurse or secretary, or maybe
a waitress. For a quick reference, see Julia Roberts as Erin Brockovich,
Helen Hunt in any number of roles (two come to mind, in the films
As Good As it Gets and Pay it Forward), Rene Zellweger in Jerry
Maguire, etc. She doesn’t date until the kid is old enough
to sassily insist he can take care of himself, or at least when
some close friends or family members can step in to do the light-duty
babysitting. Her relationships go very quickly from the first sexual
experience to marriage, because years of hard work have reformed
her morally, and she knows how important it is to find a daddy
for sweetums.
And then there’s the third, and most delicate,
category. The Professional-class Independent is Diane Keaton in
Baby Boom,
Murphy Brown, Rachel Green. She’s any number of Hollywood
actresses, because hey, we all know that marriage is as slick as
petroleum in the biz, but the maternal urge is fundamental. The
Professional-class Independent is entitled to do what she wants,
because she’s rich. Long hours in the office, on the set?
No problem! She can afford to get the very best caregivers. She’s
not a burden on the taxpayers like the Welfare Leech, and we can’t
expect her to rush into marriage because let’s face it —
a woman as powerful as she is probably emasculates her sexual partners.
And since we know she’ll be able to afford the very best
private school, the very best tutors and, if it comes down to
it, the very best psychologists, we don’t need to worry about
her parenting decisions. That’s her business, no one else’s.

One of the many draws of “Gilmore Girls” is
the refreshing sparkle of Lorelai Gilmore. The show’s synopsis
on the WB website makes her seem woefully contrite: “Thirtysomething
Lorelai Gilmore has made her share of mistakes in life, but she
has been
doing her best to see that her daughter — and best friend
in the world — Rory, doesn’t follow in her footsteps.” All
traces of self-condemnation have disappeared in later seasons,
and Lorelai’s breakdown in a recent episode over her loneliness
and sense of futility was all the more poignant for its rarity.
She’s funny as hell, flakey and bouncily defiant of the
world’s judgment, which is most often channeled through her
mother. Sure, okay, she’s fictional. One of the things the
show likes to emphasize is her absolute financial independence
while raising Rory: from her parents, presumably from her also-teenaged
boyfriend. But what’s even more thrilling for me than Lorelai
and Rory’s perpetual fun-time relationship is Lorelai’s
individuality.
At the end of the day, though, none of the stereotyping
or the strange expectations of single motherhood matter to me as
much
as they did when I was pregnant. What kills me are the daily reminders
of fatherlessness that someday, much sooner than I’d like,
my daughter will be old enough to understand. She doesn’t
need a daddy. The tragedy of the absentee father is a myth, one
I’d like to feed into a giant, country-sized shredder. (It
has nothing to do with financial responsibility, but let’s
not touch that hot potato right now.) It will be traumatic if she’s
made to feel somehow deprived by popular culture, by her teachers,
by her friends. And this is where “One Tree Hill” comes in, a show
not for me, but for her. I hope in the lightning-fast revolution
of cultural fads and norms, “illegitimates” will be
commonplace, the very concept of paternal illegitimacy a
dinosaur whose bones calcify beneath a more inclusive turf.

So, say what you will about the corporate
and consumerist nature of network TV programming; Bastard Night
is ours. (Ours in the
way that I’ve expropriated the word “bastard,” let
it be noted. I’ll stop that until a time when my daughter
is of the age of irony and can decide for herself what expropriations
she’d like made on her behalf, thank you very much.) I’m
pouring a glass of red wine. I’m rushing back and forth from
the laundry room during the commercials. And when I peek in on
my baby, before I climb into my own bed, I’m feeling the
glow of commiseration brought on by the most sublimely realized
art.
Art?
Yes, art. Now, sssssh. I’ve got to
get up at the crack of dawn, warm the bottle, change the diaper,
brew the coffee, dress
the baby, feed her the bottle, run in and out of the shower, pack
the bag, put on the jacket…

back to top
|