| |

Cautionary Tales from TV Land

Part 1: “The Ben Stiller Show”

By Chris Roberson
The history of television is replete with stories
of good shows that went nowhere. Sometimes this is because network
executives don’t give the show enough time or support; other
times, it’s because established competitors in the same time slot
keep the potential audience from noticing the newcomer. Sometimes
advertisers don’t see the point of continuing to sponsor a wobbly
program; sometimes staffing changes at the network doom a show
that a former executive had nurtured.
And sometimes all of these things happen together.
Case in point: “The Ben Stiller Show.” It was one of those wonderful
concentrations of talent that happen rarely and are seized upon
even more rarely. All four of its cast members — Ben Stiller, Andy
Dick, Janeane Garofalo and Bob Odenkirk — have since done excellent
work (and received a great deal of critical acclaim) in television,
film and standup comedy. The same holds true of many of its writers,
most notably David Cross, who (among other projects) collaborated
with Odenkirk for several years to produce, write, and act in “Mr.
Show” for HBO. Writer/producer Judd Apatow has worked on critical
favorites such as “The Larry Sanders Show,” “The Critic” and “Freaks
and Geeks.”
These
talented writers and actors had excellent chemistry and created
13 clever, funny half-hours of television. Unfortunately, this
wasn’t enough to keep it from being canceled after half a season.
The recently released complete two-DVD set of “The Ben Stiller
Show,” however, helps prevent it from sinking into obscurity, as
well as giving some insight into what went wrong. The DVD’s plentiful
extras (most notably the commentary tracks on eight of the episodes)
help clear up just exactly what doomed the show, as well as celebrating
what they were able to accomplish during its short life.
“The Ben Stiller Show” premiered in 1992 after
two years of pre-production. Stiller had made a maskeshift version
of the show for MTV in 1990, and he and Apatow eventually convinced
executives at HBO to take on a similar project. If it had stayed
there, it might have had a longer run. But HBO was interested in
expanding into production for other networks, so the show was eventually
sold to Fox. As luck would have it, the executives who had bought
the show had been replaced by the time the program finally made
it to air, and the new crew had little interest in Stiller. It
was initially scheduled outside prime time, competing against “60
Minutes” (at the time, the highest-rated program on Sunday nights).
After several weeks near the bottom of the ratings, it was moved
to a Time Slot of Death (Sunday at 10:30 p.m.), and finally canceled
after only 12 episodes had aired. (The 13th episode didn’t air
until Comedy Central reran all of the episodes late in the ’90s.)
Although this history shows up in bits and pieces
on the commentary tracks, most of the commentary is devoted to
talking about the episodes themselves and the cast and crew’s memories
of the production. (The commentator list varies by episode, but
Stiller is present for all of them, and the other cast members
for most.) The quality of the commentary is above average compared
to many other DVDs; the memories of the cast and crew are generally
quite sharp and their analyses insightful. Other extras include
a number of sketches that were (wisely) cut and some excellent
outtakes that present the show’s good use of improvisation. (Garofalo
has remarked both here and elsewhere that it was an unpleasant
shock to discover that the show’s supportive, collaborative work
environment was a rarity in the industry.)
At times, the commentators seem mystified by
how some of their ideas succeeded. Take, for example, Episode 9’s Husbands
and Wives parody, “Woody Allen’s Bride of Frankenstein.”
While it plays, the writers list all the reasons why it shouldn’t
work: a strange, obscurantist concept (famous movie monsters as
Woody Allen characters); a premise that requires the viewer to
have seen Husbands and Wives; and a downer ending. And yet
it does work. Though I think that in this case the writers sell
themselves short. 1992 had been the year of the great Soon-Yi scandal,
and a lot of people had seen Husbands and Wives or were
familiar with it because of reviews and news coverage. The concept
was admittedly odd (and had in fact come about by accident), but
fell into place quite nicely: Woody Allen could play the Mummy
any day, and Sydney Pollack has an uncanny resemblance to Frankenstein
(sorry, Frankenstein’s monster).
The fact that the writers were free to explore
oddball ideas like this one, and others such as “Manson” (“Lassie”
with Charles Manson in the dog’s role), is what helps keep it fresh
today. Ironically, that artistic success may have resulted in part
from the show’s commercial failure. The participants knew early
on in its run that the show was almost certainly doomed (the source
of quite a few jokes in the episodes), and this removed much of
the pressure to conform to the usual standards of mediocrity. And
although it is tempting to wonder what might have been, perhaps
the best thing to do is simply to enjoy what they were able to
produce.

back to top
|