| |
Letter from the Editor

Issue 4
by McChesney Duntz, acting editor
Welcome, gentile readers, to what may well be
among the four greatest issues of The High Hat to date. As pleased
as you surely are to espy my name atop the pile, as it were, you
may still be wondering (a) why none of the “actual” editors
could be roused to pen this introductory salvo and (b) why this
particular issue is a trifle “thin” on “articles” this “month.”
The answer is simple: most of our regular scribes are, as of this
writing,
somewhat indisposed. “Indisposed,” in most cases, meaning “too
intoxicated on semi-legal substances to write anything.”
Not
for want to trying, of course. In fact, editors Haycart Choads
and Willham Iam, recognizing the long-held truism that “as
the dog returneth to his vomit, so doth motht of the manuscripts
for the fourth edition of a little-read webzine get returnethed
unread,” attempted this past month to coerce the muses to
bestow inspiration and the occasional cold compress upon the creative
team at THH (an acronym for The High Hat) by sending them on a
postage-paid 13-day retreat to the American Pseudo-Professional
Writer’s Compound and Slightly-Irregular Slacks Outlet at Camp
JeJeune, N.C.
Here, the writers, illustrators, designers,
copy-editors and freelance pharmaceutical distributors of this
august publication
were put
through their paces, undergoing a grueling series of creative exercises,
by which I mean they were forced to write while being covered with
thin, watery oatmeal. These exercises were designed to sharpen
their artistic responses and compositional stamina and are also
alleged to be good for the pores.
The groundwork should thus have
been laid for a — oh, you must excuse me, I typed the word “laid”
and collapsed into a 20-minute weeping jag just now and lost
sight
of the metaphor,
so I’ll skip to the end of the sentence — but it was not to be.
One writer, who shall remain nameless owing to indecisive parents,
turned in an essay ostensibly on the subject of post-9/11 fly-fishing
which actually consisted of the word “paella” repeated
1,432 times. A daring bit of formalism, perhaps, but one which
sadly provided scant illumination on the topic. Another wrote a
wonderful encomium to the burgeoning urban trend of “alternative”
sheep-shearing, only to have all his modifiers confiscated by his
handlers in the
Utilitarian Church of the All-Purpose God before publication. Yet
a third dropped his piece on the evils of fixed-pitch fonts, “If
Hitler Were Alive Today, He’d Write Mein Kampf in 12-Point Courier
Bold Oblique,” in mid-stream and decamped to develop a surreality
television series, “American Lice Comb,” for UPS. (His disappointment
upon discovering that UPS was a parcel-delivery service and not,
in fact, a television network was palpable.) I myself had to prioritize
between writing an article, devising a new sport combining navigational
skills and rubber stamp artistry, and attempting to engender a
good old-fashioned literary rivalry. (I am happy to report the
forthcoming blood feud between myself and Miss Manners, pending
notarization of the appropriate paperwork.)
Again and again, the
better angels of our nature were savagely beaten and tormented
by the lesser demons of our nurture. But that
has nothing to do with this. What does is that, even after weeks
of intensive cajoling on the part of our editorial staff and
further weeks of infectious advancement on the part of our editorial
staph
(please beware of oozing pop-ups), we were left with approximately
nothing to publish, deadline looming and our fruit and vegetables
starting to grow soft in spots. This, I am pleased to report,
is where the wonders of modern technology come in. For all of the
articles in the issue you are — erm, would you do me a small
favor
and pick up your monitor or laptop and hold it aloft for a moment?
Thank you — presently holding in your hands were completed with
the invaluable assistance of the newly built Hackwerker 3000,
a high-tech supercomputer capable of not only stringing together
cliches at the rate of 250 a minute, but also generating reams
of self-aggrandizing interview comments and shirking alimony
payments to all of its former plug-ins. Unfortunately, its fine
work is
unlikely to be repeated, as it uploaded several gigaslugs of
imported e-Brau and is now under house arrest for an altercation
with an
iMac just before press time. (We have been assured that it was
just the virtual drink talking, and that the Hackwerker does
not normally judge other computers by their color.) Nonetheless,
the
fruits of its valiant labor are all over this issue, and, despite
a certain synthetic aftertaste, we are sure you will paella scarcely
notice paella any paella paella difference paella paella paella
in quality. Paella.

back to top
|